Ohio Court of Appeals, 1990

Langsam v. Tindera

Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided January 22, 1990 · McManamon, Krupansky, Corrigan

580 N.E.2d 1157; 64 Ohio App. 3d 228 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Earth Mobile, Inc. v. U.S. Bank, N.A. (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)
Caruthers v. Caruthers, Unpublished Decision (1-25-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We dismiss as moot the plaintiffs appeal. In his single assignment of error, the plaintiff claims that the trial court erred in failing to file findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Civ.R. 52. The record reveals that the trial court filed those requested findings of fact and conclusions of law on June 14, 1989. The trial court retained jurisdiction to make findings of fact and conclusions of law despite the fact that the appeal may have already been filed. Cf. App.R. 9(E); John G. Johnson & Sons Constr. Co. v. A-T-O, Inc. (Sept. 1, 1983), Cuyahoga App. No. 44900, unreported, 1983 WL 4673.

Since there is no issue before this court for review, we hereby dismiss the plaintiffs appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Ann McManamon, C.J., Krupansky and John F. Corrigan, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.