State v. Noling, Unpublished Decision (6-30-1999)
State v. Noling, Unpublished Decision (6-30-1999)
Opinion of the Court
Since the founding of the Republic our society has been based upon the premise that criminals shall be punished in the hope that others will be deterred from following a life of crime. In this matter, a jury has imposed, and the majority has approved, the death penalty. I must dissent from the majority's well-reasoned opinion, however, for the following reasons.
R.C.
In fulfilling my duties as a 13th juror, I simply am not persuaded that the tragedy of this case rises to such a high level as to require the imposition of the death penalty. Simply stated, it is clear that the facts equally support the conclusion that we are faced with teenage robbers who clearly got in over their head. Tyrone Lee Noling was barely past his eighteenth birthday when he made all the wrong decisions, which led to the tragic death of Mr. and Mrs. Hartig. It was a robbery by a group of misguided youths that went astray and led to two deaths.
I believe that when the aggravating circumstances are weighed against the mitigating factors the appropriate sentence is life in prison without eligibility for parole. Two people are dead as a result of a robbery gone wrong. Society's protection is not dependent upon a third death.
________________________________ JUDGE WILLIAM M. O'NEILL
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.