State v. Wesley, Unpublished Decision (4-19-1999)
State v. Wesley, Unpublished Decision (4-19-1999)
Opinion of the Court
Defendant Lawrence R. Wesley appeals a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Muskingum County, Ohio, overruling his motion to re-sentence him. Appellant assigns a single error to the trial court:
ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR
THE TRIAL COURT DID VIOLATE APPELLANT'S CONSTITUTION RIGHTS UNDER THE OHIO CONSTITUTION.
The record indicates appellant was convicted of one count of aggravated robbery in violation of R.C.
Appellant argues pursuant to Senate Bill 2, effective July 1, 1996, he should have been permitted to elect to be sentenced under the amended statutes which were effective July 1, 1996.
In State v. Rush (1998),
We conclude because appellant was convicted prior to July 1, 1996, Senate Bill 2 does not apply to him, and he was properly sentenced under the law applicable at the time he was sentenced.
The assignment of error is overruled.
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Muskingum County, Ohio, is affirmed, and the cause is remanded to that court for execution of sentence.
By Gwin, J., Wise, P.J., and Reader, V.J., concur.
---------------------
---------------------
--------------------- JUDGES
For the reasons stated in the Memorandum-Opinion on file, the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Muskingum County, Ohio, is affirmed, and the cause is remanded to that court for execution of sentence. Costs to appellant.
---------------------
---------------------
--------------------- JUDGES
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.