State v. Drake, Unpublished Decision (2-12-1999)
State v. Drake, Unpublished Decision (2-12-1999)
Opinion of the Court
On July 18, 1994, appellee pled guilty to one count of rape in violation of R.C.
In 1997, the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction recommended that the trial court schedule a hearing to determine whether appellee was a sexual predator pursuant to R.C. Chapter 2950. On July 1, 1997, the trial court dismissed the pending sexual predator proceeding against appellee without holding a hearing. The trial court held that the application of R.C. Chapter 2950 to sex offenders who were convicted and sentenced prior to January 1, 1997 violated the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution and the Retroactivity Clause of the Ohio Constitution. Ultimately, however, these same arguments were rejected by the Supreme Court of Ohio in State v. Cook (1998),
Following the Supreme Court's ruling in Cook, this court held that R.C. Chapter 2950 was unconstitutional as applied to sexual predators under Section
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. _____________________________ JUDGE WILLIAM M. O'NEILL
FORD, P.J.,
NADER, J., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.