State v. King, Unpublished Decision (2-12-1999)
State v. King, Unpublished Decision (2-12-1999)
Opinion of the Court
In 1993, appellee pled guilty to two counts of attempted rape in violation of R.C.
In 1997, the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction recommended that the trial court schedule a hearing to determine whether appellee was a sexual predator pursuant to R.C. Chapter 2950. On July 1, 1997, the trial court dismissed the pending sexual predator proceeding against appellee without holding a hearing. The trial court did so based on its conclusion that the application of R.C. Chapter 2950 to sex offenders who were convicted and sentenced prior to January 1, 1997 violated the ExPost Facto Clause of the United States Constitution and the Retroactivity Clause of the Ohio Constitution. Ultimately, however, these same arguments were rejected by the Supreme Court of Ohio in State v. Cook (1998),
The decision of the trial court to dismiss the sexual predator proceedings against appellee on the basis of the precedent established by this court in State v. Williams (Jan. 29, 1999), Lake App. No. 97-L-191, unreported, is hereby affirmed on alternative grounds. __________________________ JUDGE ROBERT A. NADER
FORD, P.J.,
O'NEILL, J., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.