Ohio Court of Appeals, 1999

State v. Murdock, Unpublished Decision (8-13-1999)

State v. Murdock, Unpublished Decision (8-13-1999)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided August 13, 1999

State v. Murdock, Unpublished Decision (8-13-1999)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Appeal dismissed. See Memorandum Opinion and Judgment Entry. [FORD] (CHRISTLEY) (NADER)

APPELLATE PROCEDURE:
When an appellant's averments in his App.R. 5(A) motion for delayed appeal fail to provide any specific reasons why he delayed for over two years any attempt to initiate a direct appeal of his conviction and sentence, the motion will be denied, and the appeal will be dismissed.

A successive appeal may not be taken from the same judgment entry that has already been appealed and then voluntarily dismissed. See State v. Haynes (1996), 111 Ohio App.3d 244.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.