State v. Murdock, Unpublished Decision (8-13-1999)
State v. Murdock, Unpublished Decision (8-13-1999)
State v. Murdock, Unpublished Decision (8-13-1999)
Opinion of the Court
When an appellant's averments in his App.R. 5(A) motion for delayed appeal fail to provide any specific reasons why he delayed for over two years any attempt to initiate a direct appeal of his conviction and sentence, the motion will be denied, and the appeal will be dismissed.A successive appeal may not be taken from the same judgment entry that has already been appealed and then voluntarily dismissed. See State v. Haynes (1996),
111 Ohio App.3d 244 .
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.