State v. Industrial Commission, Unpublished Decision (11-4-1999)
State v. Industrial Commission, Unpublished Decision (11-4-1999)
Opinion of the Court
The matter was referred to a magistrate of this court pursuant to Civ.R. 53(C) and Loc.R. 12(M) of the Tenth District Court of Appeals. After examining the evidence, the magistrate issued a decision, including findings of fact and conclusions of law. The magistrate determined that the commission's order fails to comply with Noll and recommended that this court grant a limited writ of mandamus ordering the commission to vacate its order denying relator's PTD application and to enter a new order in compliance with Noll.
Relator has filed objections to the magistrate's decision, arguing that he is entitled to PTD compensation pursuant to State ex rel.Gay v. Mihm (1994),
Upon an examination of the magistrate's decision and an independent review of the file, this court adopts the magistrate's decision as its own, including the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained therein. As such, this court hereby issues a limited writ of mandamus ordering the Industrial Commission of Ohio to vacate its order denying relator's request for PTD compensation, and to enter an order in compliance with Noll, supra, either granting or denying relator's PTD application.
Objections overruled; limited writ granted.
TYACK and DESHLER, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.