State Ex Rel. P.E.T. v. Industrial Comm., Unpublished Decision (11-9-1999)
State Ex Rel. P.E.T. v. Industrial Comm., Unpublished Decision (11-9-1999)
Opinion of the Court
This court referred the matter to a magistrate, pursuant to Civ.R. 53(C) and Loc.R. 12(M) of the Tenth District Court of Appeals, who issued a decision, including findings of fact and conclusions of law. The magistrate concluded that the commission had abused its discretion by its failure to address the interphalangeal joint ankylosis. However, the magistrate further concluded that relator was entitled to the scheduled loss award as a matter of law and that this court should deny the requested writ.
No objections have been filed to the decision of the magistrate.
Finding no error or other defect on the face of the magistrate's decision, pursuant to Civ.R. 53, we adopt the decision of the magistrate as our own, including the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in it. In accordance with the decision of the magistrate, the requested writ of mandamus is denied.
Writ of mandamus denied.
PETREE and TYACK, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.