State v. Anderson, Unpublished Decision (12-22-1999)
State v. Anderson, Unpublished Decision (12-22-1999)
Opinion of the Court
Defendant, Michael Anderson, appeals from a Summit County Court of Common Pleas denial of his petition for postconviction relief. We affirm.
In June, 1997, Defendant was indicted on one count of theft in violation of R.C.
ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR I
[Defendant] was denied effective assistance of trial counsel and compulsory process where trial attorney failed to subpoena witnesses.
ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR II
[Defendant] was denied effective assistance of trial counsel where attorney failed to investigate and interview witnesses, where investigation would have revealed evidence bearing upon the credibility of the State[']s witness.
ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR III
[Defendant] was denied effective assistance of counsel where counsel failed to subpoena Detective Fields regarding the arresting officer[s'] report, and the incredible inconsistencies between the two arresting officers.
The Supreme Court of Ohio has stated that:
Where [a] defendant, represented by new counsel upon direct appeal, fails to raise therein the issue of competent trial counsel and said issue could fairly have been determined without resort to evidence dehors the record, res judicata is a proper basis for dismissing defendant's petition for postconviction relief.
State v. Cole (1982),
Appellant was represented by different counsel on direct appeal. The only additional evidence submitted in support of his ineffective assistance of counsel claim are two affidavits claiming that the state's witness committed perjury and falsified information regarding the identification of Defendant in relation to the charges of theft and forgery. These affidavits relate to charges wholly outside of the current case and are insufficient to demonstrate that Appellant could not have raised ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal. Therefore, Defendant's first, second, and third assignments of error are overruled as barred by res judicata and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
We order that a special mandate issue out of this Court, directing the Court of Common Pleas, County of Summit, to carry this judgment into execution. A certified copy of this journal entry shall constitute the mandate, pursuant to App.R. 27.
Immediately upon the filing hereof, this document shall constitute the journal entry of judgment, and it shall be file stamped by the Clerk of the Court of Appeals at which time the period for review shall begin to run. App.R. 22(E).
Costs taxed to Appellant.
Exceptions.
LYNN C. SLABY, FOR THE COURT
BAIRD, P.J. and CARR, J. CONCUR
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.