Streb v. Amf Bowling Centers, Inc., Unpublished Decision (8-19-1999)
Streb v. Amf Bowling Centers, Inc., Unpublished Decision (8-19-1999)
Opinion of the Court
Counsel for the estate then filed a notice of appeal of the trial court's ruling. Attorneys for AMF — related entities have filed a motion asking that the appeal be dismissed. Counsel for the estate responded with a motion to strike the AMF motion. The motion to dismiss and the motion to strike are now before the court for review.
The record before us does not reflect service of process on any of the named defendants. The record before us also does not reflect a waiver of service or any other document in the record which would permit the trial court to assert jurisdiction over any of the named defendants. Under the circumstances, the AMF — related entities have not appeared and submitted to the jurisdiction of the trial court.
The motion to strike the motion to dismiss is, therefore, granted.
However, appellant is attempting to pursue an appeal from a trial court ruling which does not constitute a final appealable order as defined in R.C.
Motion to strike granted; appeal dismissed sua sponte.
BOWMAN and DESHLER, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.