State Ex Rel. Schlote v. Industrial Comm., Unpublished Decision (8-12-1999)
State Ex Rel. Schlote v. Industrial Comm., Unpublished Decision (8-12-1999)
Opinion of the Court
On July 30, 1998, relator's complaint was referred to a magistrate of this court, pursuant to Civ.R. 53 and Loc.R. 12(M) of the Tenth District Court of Appeals, who later rendered a decision and recommendation, which included comprehensive findings of fact and conclusions of law. Specifically, the magistrate analyzed the record and briefs of the parties and concluded that this court should grant relator's request for a writ of mandamus, as the commission did indeed fail to consider the report of relator's physician when ruling upon relator's application for reconsideration. As such, the magistrate recommended that we direct the commission to vacate its May 29, 1998 order and to issue an amended order after it has considered all of the evidence presented. No objections to the magistrate's decision have been filed.
Upon review, this court concludes that the magistrate discerned the pertinent legal issues and properly applied the applicable law to those issues. Having completed an independent review, we have found no error in either the magistrate's decision or analysis. Accordingly, we hereby adopt the magistrate's decision as our own, including the findings of fact and conclusions of law rendered therein, and grant the requested writ of mandamus.
Writ granted.
KENNEDY and BRYANT, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.