Quinn v. Fry, Unpublished Decision (10-6-2000)
Quinn v. Fry, Unpublished Decision (10-6-2000)
Quinn v. Fry, Unpublished Decision (10-6-2000)
Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Plaintiffs-appellants Patrick and Martha Quinn appeal three separate judgment entries filed by the Knox County Court of Common Pleas on March 29, 2000, dismissing their claim against defendants-appellees Barbara A. Fry, Martha Denman and Real Estate Showcase, Inc., and Sam Miller and Re/Max Stars.I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES, AS GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT EXIST.
Upon review of the record, we conclude the judgments appealed from do not constitute a final appealable order. Appellee Barbara Fry's counterclaim remains pending in the trial court. The trial court's three judgment entries filed March 29, 2000, do not contain the trial court's conclusion there is not just cause for delay in accordance with Civ.R. 54(B). The appealed entries are interlocutory orders; therefore, do not constitute final appealable orders.
This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.