State v. Price, Unpublished Decision (1-19-2000)
State v. Price, Unpublished Decision (1-19-2000)
Opinion of the Court
Defendant-appellant, Dwight L. Price, appeals the judgment of the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas denying his motion to withdraw guilty pleas. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court's judgment.
On September 21, 1995, Price entered guilty pleas to one count each of involuntary manslaughter and aggravated robbery, with a firearm specification. On January 27, 1999, he filed a motion to withdraw the guilty pleas under Crim. R. 32.1. The trial court denied the motion, and Price filed the instant appeal.
In his sole assignment of error, Price contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion without an evidentiary hearing. We are not persuaded by this argument. As we have previously held, a motion filed pursuant to Crim.R. 32.1 must be filed before the expiration of the time for a direct appeal.1 Otherwise, the motion should be construed as a petition for postconviction relief and therefore subject to the time constraints set forth in R.C.
In the case at bar, Price filed the motion to withdraw the guilty pleas well past the time allotted for a direct appeal. Thus, we construe the motion as a petition for postconviction relief. Construed as such under R.C.
Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Further, a certified copy of this Judgment Entry shall constitute the mandate, which shall be sent to the trial court under App.R. 27. Costs shall be taxed under App.R. 24.
DOAN, P.J., GORMAN and SHANNON, JJ.
RAYMOND E. SHANNON, retired, of the First Appellate District, sitting by assignment.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.