State Ex Rel. Bristow v. Ritz, Unpublished Decision (8-14-2000)
State Ex Rel. Bristow v. Ritz, Unpublished Decision (8-14-2000)
Opinion of the Court
OPINION
This case involves an original action to this Court on a Writ of Mandamus whereby Relator alleges Respondent has failed to perform his legal duties pursuant to Ohio Administrative CodeFor a writ of mandamus to be granted, Relator must demonstrate: (1) that Relator has no plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law; (2) that Respondent is under a clear legal duty to perform some act or acts; and (3) that Relator has a clear legal right to the relief prayed for. See State ex rel.Berger v. McMonagle (1983),
The inmate procedure provided in Ohio Adm. Code
Assuming arguendo that Relator had exhausted all his administrative remedies, his petition would still have to be dismissed. R.C.
For all the reasons cited above, Relator's request for Writ of Mandamus is without merit.
Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is granted. Costs taxed against Relator.
Final order. Clerk to serve copy of this order to the parties as provided by the Civil Rules.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.