City of Toledo v. Abu, Unpublished Decision (12-22-2000)
City of Toledo v. Abu, Unpublished Decision (12-22-2000)
Opinion of the Court
Appellant, who had been charged with one count of menacing by stalking, entered his plea on May 12, 1999 to a violation of R.C.
February 14, 2000, he filed his motion to withdraw his guilty plea, arguing that his plea was the result of a gross misunderstanding as to the effect of his plea.
A hearing on a post-sentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea is not mandated if the facts alleged by the defendant and accepted as true by the trial court would not require the court to allow the withdrawal of the plea. State v. Blatnik (1984),
On consideration whereof, this court finds that appellant was not prejudiced, and the judgment of the Toledo Municipal Court is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed to appellant.
James R. Sherck, J., George M. Glasser, J., JUDGES CONCUR.____________________________________ Richard W. Knepper, P.J.
Judge George M. Glasser, retired, sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Ohio.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.