State v. Bouldin, Unpublished Decision (5-24-2000)
State v. Bouldin, Unpublished Decision (5-24-2000)
Opinion of the Court
Having found no nonfrivolous issues to raise on appeal, Bouldin's counsel now asks this court to examine the record for errors and has submitted a motion to withdraw from representation. See Penson v. Ohio (1988),
Satisfied that counsel has provided Bouldin with a diligent and thorough search of the record, we hold that counsel has concluded correctly that this appeal is frivolous. Therefore, we deny counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the judgment of the trial court. Although we hold that this appeal is frivolous under App.R. 23, we refrain from taxing costs and expenses against Bouldin because he is clearly indigent.
Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
PAINTER and WINKLER, JJ.______________________________ HILDEBRANDT, PRESIDING JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.