State v. Albrecht, Unpublished Decision (12-29-2000)
State v. Albrecht, Unpublished Decision (12-29-2000)
Opinion of the Court
On appeal, appellant asserts the following single assignment of error raising multiple issues:
"THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FAILING TO GRANT DEFENDANT-APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE PROCEEDINGS HELD PURUSANT TO OHIO'S SEX OFFENDER STATUTE, R.C. SECTION 2950, ON THE GROUNDS [SIC] THAT THE STATUTE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS IT IS APPLIED TO DEFENDANT-APPELLANT."
Appellant first argues that the sexual predator statute is unconstitutional because it violates the Retroactivity Clause of the Ohio Constitution and the ex post facto provisions of the United States Constitution. The Ohio Supreme Court has already addressed these issues and found that the statute does not violate these constitutional provisions. State v. Cook (1998),
Appellant also argues that the statute violates the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution and the Equal Protection Clauses of the United States and Ohio Constitutions. These issues have also been reviewed by the Ohio Supreme Court, which has held that the statute does not violate these constitutional provisions. State v. Williams (2000),
Accordingly, appellant's sole assignment of error is not well-taken. Judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed. Pursuant to App.R. 24, appellant is hereby ordered to pay the court costs incurred on appeal.
James R. Sherck, J., Richard W. Knepper, P.J. JUDGE CONCUR.________________________________ George M. Glasser, J.
Judge George M. Glasser, retired, sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Ohio.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.