State v. Krause, Unpublished Decision (7-24-2000)
State v. Krause, Unpublished Decision (7-24-2000)
Opinion of the Court
DECISION This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Warren County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the briefs, oral argument having been waived.
Counsel for defendant-appellant, Alfred Krause, filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California (1967),
Appellant has filed a pro se brief raising assignments of error pertaining to the unconstitutionality of Ohio's sexual predator law and ineffective assistance of counsel at the sexual predator hearing. We have accordingly examined the record, the potential assignments of error presented in counsel's brief, and the assignments of error in appellant's pro se brief and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. Therefore, the motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.
____________________________ Per Curiam.
POWELL, P.J., YOUNG and WALSH, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.