State v. Fuerst, Unpublished Decision (10-29-2001)
State v. Fuerst, Unpublished Decision (10-29-2001)
Opinion of the Court
In this action in mandamus, relator requests that this court compel respondent clerk to correct the journal entry "to have the journal entry * * * read as the sentence that was imposed upon the relator." Complaint, par. 5. Yet, "the clerk does not have the power to issue orders." State ex rel. Hussing v. Court of Common Pleas (Oct. 1, 1998), Cuyahoga App. No. 74891, unreported, at 5. After the court issues a judgment, the clerk enters the judgment on the journal. Crim.R. 32(C). Relator has not set forth any clear legal duty on the part of respondent clerk to change the journal entry.
Accordingly, respondent's motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, motion to dismiss is granted. Relator to pay costs. The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B)
PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, J., and ANNE L. KILBANE, J., CONCUR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.