State v. West, Unpublished Decision (11-26-2001)
State v. West, Unpublished Decision (11-26-2001)
Opinion of the Court
Appellant's first and second assignments of error are overruled for the reason that there is clear and convincing evidence in the record to support the trial court's determination that appellant is a sexual predator. See R.C.
Appellant's third assignment of error is overruled for the reason that the Ohio Rules of Evidence do not strictly apply to sexual predator adjudication hearings. State v. Cook (1998),
Upon consideration of the foregoing, the trial court's decision is affirmed.
Pursuant to App.R. 11.1(E), this entry shall not be relied upon as authority and shall not be published in any form.
A certified copy of this judgment entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27. Costs to be taxed to appellant.
ANTHONY VALEN, Judge, STEPHEN W. POWELL, Judge, concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.