State v. Thrash, Unpublished Decision (7-5-2001)
State v. Thrash, Unpublished Decision (7-5-2001)
Opinion of the Court
Defendant-appellant, Darrell I. Thrash, appeals the judgment of the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas convicting him of domestic violence, a felony of the fifth degree as charged. Thrash was found guilty of the offense after entering a plea of no contest.
On appeal, Thrash's counsel has reviewed the record, states that he is unable to identify any prejudicial error in the proceedings below, and requests this court to independently review the record to determine if any such error occurred before the trial court. Therefore, this court, pursuant to Anders v. California,1 is required to review the record, counsel's brief, and all applicable authorities to determine whether this appeal is, in fact, without merit and wholly frivolous.
Our review of the record discloses no grounds to support a meritorious appeal. We conclude, therefore, that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Although we hold that this appeal is frivolous pursuant to App.R. 23 and without reasonable cause under R.C.
Further, a certified copy of this Judgment Entry shall constitute the mandate, which shall be sent to the trial court under App.R. 27. Costs shall be taxed under App.R. 24.
Hildebrandt, P.J., Painter and Shannon, JJ.
Raymond E. Shannon, retired, of the First Appellate District, sitting by assignment.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.