Ohio Court of Appeals, 2001

Coy v. Court Diagnostic & Treatment Center

Coy v. Court Diagnostic & Treatment Center
Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided August 21, 2001 · Handwork, Pietrykowski, Resnick
761 N.E.2d 697; 144 Ohio App. 3d 779; 2001 Ohio App. LEXIS 3742 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Coy v. Court Diagnostic & Treatment Center

Opinion of the Court

Handwork, Judge.

David R. Coy is asking this court to issue a writ of mandamus to compel the Court Diagnostic & Treatment Center (“center”) to release a copy of a report of the results of a mental competence evaluation that was performed on Coy at the center. Sixth Dist.Loc.App.R. 6 provides: “An original action, other than habeas corpus, shall be instituted by the filing of an original and three copies of a complaint. The petitioner or relator shall also file a praecipe directing the clerk of the court of appeals to serve a copy of the complaint on each other party at the addresses listed in the praecipe.” (Emphasis added.) No praecipe was filed by *780 Coy. Accordingly, this court orders Coy’s petition for mandamus dismissed for failure to comply with Sixth Dist.Lo.c.App.R. 6. Costs to petitioner Coy.

Petition dismissed.

Mark L. Pietrykowski, P.J., and Melvin L. Resnick, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.