Hannah v. Merkle, Unpublished Decision (8-15-2001)
Hannah v. Merkle, Unpublished Decision (8-15-2001)
Opinion of the Court
We overrule the sole assignment of error advanced on appeal by plaintiff-appellant Jeff Hannah, d.b.a. Hannah Landscaping Lawn Care, upon our determination that the trial court properly entered judgment for defendant-appellee Robert A. Merkle on Hannah's complaint to recover amounts allegedly owed for landscaping and lawn-care services provided by Hannah at Wesleyan Cemetery. The trial court's determination that Merkle could not be held personally liable on the debt cannot be said to have been contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence, when the court, sitting as the trier of fact, had before it competent and credible evidence to support its conclusion that Merkle had disclosed to Hannah the existence of an agency relationship and the identity of his principal, Wesleyan Cemetery Association, and that Merkle had acted within the scope of his authority. See Dunn v. Westlake (1991),
We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Further, a certified copy of this Judgment Entry shall constitute the mandate, which shall be sent to the trial court under App.R. 27. Costs shall be taxed under App.R. 24.
Painter, P.J., Sundermann and Shannon, JJ.
Raymond E. Shannon, retired, from the First Appellate District, sitting by assignment.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.