State v. Winland, Unpublished Decision (11-5-2001)
State v. Winland, Unpublished Decision (11-5-2001)
Opinion of the Court
DECISION JUDGMENT ENTRY
It appearing that the judgment from which appellant, Henry Winland, appealed that denied his motion to dismiss, was not a final appealable order pursuant to R.C.
As a general rule, an order denying a motion to dismiss is not a final appealable order. See State v. Eberhardt (1978),
Appellant asserts that this case is, in all practical aspects, identical to State v. Thomas (1980),
We further note that the trial court noted on its judgment below that "This is a final appealable order." However, this court is not bound by a trial court's determination on that issue. See Ft. Frye Teachers Assn.v. Ft. Frye Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1993),
Upon consideration, this court finds that the Judgment Entry from which this appeal is taken is not a final appealable order pursuant to R.C.
APPEAL DISMISSED. Costs to appellant.
It is further ordered that a special mandate issue out of this Court directing the Hocking County Court of Common Pleas to carry this judgment into execution.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Exceptions.
Roger L. Kline, Administrative Judge, Abele, J. and Evans, J. Concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.