City of Fairfield v. Stickler, Unpublished Decision (10-15-2001)
City of Fairfield v. Stickler, Unpublished Decision (10-15-2001)
Opinion of the Court
Appellant's assignment of error claims that the trial court erred by denying her motion to dismiss under Ohio's speedy trial statute. Appellant's assignment of error is overruled for two reasons. First, appellant's request for a pretrial conference tolled the speedy trial statute thirty-four days. See State v. Wirtanen (1996),
Upon consideration of the foregoing, the trial court's decision is affirmed.
Pursuant to App.R. 11.1(E), this entry shall not be relied upon as authority and shall not be published in any form.
A certified copy of this judgment entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27.
Costs to be taxed to appellant.
William W. Young, Presiding Judge, Anthony Valen, Judge, Stephen W. Powell, Judge.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.