Meyers v. Meyers, Unpublished Decision (8-6-2001)
Meyers v. Meyers, Unpublished Decision (8-6-2001)
Opinion of the Court
In the first assignment of error, appellant argues that the trial court erred by overruling the motion to modify child support. In its consideration of appellant's motion to modify child support, the trial court found that appellant had failed to establish a change of circumstances that warranted a modification of child support. See Carsonv. Carson (1989),
Appellant further argues in her first assignment of error that the trial court improperly overruled the motion for contempt. We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling appellant's motion for contempt and that its decision to overrule this motion should be upheld. See State ex rel. Delco Moraine Div., General Motors Corp.v. Indus. Comm. of Ohio (1990),
In the second assignment of error, appellant asserts that the trial court erred by failing to terminate the SPP. A trial court's decision regarding the allocation of parental rights and responsibilities for the care of minor children is subject to reversal only upon a demonstration of an abuse of discretion. Masters v. Masters (1994),
WALSH and POWELL, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.