Lee v. State, Unpublished Decision (7-11-2002)
Lee v. State, Unpublished Decision (7-11-2002)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} Attached to the respondent's motion for summary judgment is a copy of the court's judgment entry signed by Judge Burt Griffin which denies relator's motion. Thus, the relator's request for a writ of mandamus is moot. State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman (1983),
{¶ 3} We also find that the petition for a writ of mandamus is defective since the relator failed to identify a particular individual or public office that owes a specific duty to relator. State ex rel.Sherrills v. State of Ohio (Aug. 3, 2000), Cuyahoga County App. No. 78261. Relator's failure to properly identify a respondent renders the complaint fatally defective and subject to dismissal. State ex rel. Leskov. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas (Apr. 15, 1999), Cuyahoga App. No. 76165.
{¶ 4} Furthermore, the relator failed to comply with R.C.
{¶ 5} Accordingly, we grant the respondent's motion for summary judgment. Relator to bear costs. It is further ordered that the clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and date of entry pursuant to Civ.R. 58(B).
Writ denied.
TIMOTHY E. MCMONAGLE, A.J. AND PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, J., CONCUR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.