State v. Chikhladze, Unpublished Decision (12-18-2002)
State v. Chikhladze, Unpublished Decision (12-18-2002)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} Following a jury trial, defendant-appellant Kakhaberi Chikhladze was convicted of robbery, in violation of R.C.
{¶ 3} In a single assignment of error, Chikhladze complains that the trial court failed to properly instruct the jury on the "force" element of robbery. Chikhladze failed to object to the instruction at trial, so he has waived any claim of error.1 His "failure to object to a jury instruction constitutes a waiver of any claim of error relative thereto, unless, but for the error, the outcome of the trial clearly would have been otherwise."2 "Notice of plain error under Crim.R. 52(B) is to be taken with the utmost caution, under exceptional circumstances and only to prevent a manifest miscarriage of justice."3
{¶ 4} R.C.
{¶ 5} Accordingly, we overrule the assignment of error and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
{¶ 6} Further, a certified copy of this Judgment Entry shall constitute the mandate, which shall be sent to the trial court under App.R. 27. Costs shall be taxed under App.R. 24.
Doan, P.J., Hildebrandt and Winkler, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.