Jennings v. Univ. Ear, Unpublished Decision (9-13-2002)
Jennings v. Univ. Ear, Unpublished Decision (9-13-2002)
Opinion of the Court
In Johns, this court specifically overruled its earlier decision in this case1 and held that the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to determine whether the defendant-physician, a state employee, is entitled to immunity under R.C.
Here, in its February 21, 1997, "Entry As To Immunity," attached to Dr. Wilson's motion for summary judgment, the Court of Claims determined that Dr. Wilson was not entitled to immunity under R.C.
Once the Court of Claims decided that Dr. Wilson was not entitled to immunity, "the common pleas court had subject-matter jurisdiction to determine only the merits of the negligence claims against [him] individually." Johns v. Horton, 1st Dist. No. C-010672, 2002-Ohio-3802, at ¶ 75. Thus, we sustain Jennings's first assignment.
Her second assignment of error, contesting the trial court's decision to end discovery on the immunity issue, is rendered moot by our resolution of the first assignment of error. See App.R. 12(A)(1)(c).
Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and this case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with law and with this Decision.
Judgment reversed and case remanded.
Doan, P.J., Gorman and Winkler, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.