Straubhaar v. Cigna Property Casualty, Unpublished Decision (9-12-2002)
Straubhaar v. Cigna Property Casualty, Unpublished Decision (9-12-2002)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} Although there is arguably merit to the proposition that Straubhaar's settlement against the tortfeasor destroyed Cigna's right to subrogation, we need not reach this issue as we find that
{¶ 3} the evidence showed that USX was de facto self-insured and thus not obligated to provide uninsured/underinsured motorists coverage. By taking out a policy with a deductible equal to the liability limit, Speedway/SuperAmerica became a self-insurer in the practical sense. See Grange Mut. Cas. Co. v. Refiners Transport Terminal Corp. (1986),
Judgment affirmed.
It is ordered that appellee recover of appellant its costs herein taxed.
The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the Common Pleas Court to carry this judgment into execution.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J., CONCURS.
PATRICIA A. BLACKMON, J., CONCURS IN JUDGMENT ONLY.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.