State v. Johnson, Unpublished Decision (3-22-2002)
State v. Johnson, Unpublished Decision (3-22-2002)
Opinion of the Court
Johnson's appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California
(1967),
Pursuant to Anders v. California, supra, we have performed our duty to review the record independently. We have reviewed the entire record, including a pre-sentence investigation report that was consulted by the trial court before imposing sentence.
We have found no error in the taking of the guilty plea. The trial court conducted a thorough colloquy with Johnson, in full compliance with Crim.R. 11(C).The pre-sentence investigation report includes a review of nine prior offenses, a victim impact statement reciting that the victim "believes that her life will be in danger if Mr. Johnson is released from jail," a recitation of three "more serious" seriousness factors (with no "less serious" factors), a recitation of one "recidivism likely" recidivism factors (with no "recidivism unlikely" factors), and a recommendation that Johnson be sentenced to a term of imprisonment. Notwithstanding this recommendation, the trial court imposed community control sanctions.
We find no claim of error with respect to Johnson's guilty plea or sentence having any arguable merit. Frankly, it appears to us that Johnson was fortunate to receive community control sanctions.
Because we conclude that this appeal is wholly frivolous, the judgment of the trial court is Affirmed.
WOLFF, P.J., and GRADY, J., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.