Purvis v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins., Unpublished Decision (6-17-2002)
Purvis v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins., Unpublished Decision (6-17-2002)
Opinion of the Court
While the case was still pending, the Ohio Supreme Court determined that this subrogation statute is unconstitutional. Holeton v. CrouseCartage Company,
Pursuant to App.R. 11.1(E), this entry shall not be relied upon as authority and shall not be published in any form. A certified copy of this judgment entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27.
Costs to be taxed 50% to Personal Service Insurance Company and 50% to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.
James E. Walsh, Presiding Judge, William W. Young, Judge, and Anthony Valen, Judge, concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.