State v. Helsel, Unpublished Decision (1-15-2002)
State v. Helsel, Unpublished Decision (1-15-2002)
Opinion of the Court
On March 28, 2001, a hearing was held to determine appellant's status pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act, R.C. Chapter 2950. Appellant stipulated to a "sexual predator" classification. By judgment entry filed March 30, 2001, the trial court classified appellant as a sexual predator.
Appellant filed an appeal and this matter is now before this court for consideration. Assignments of error are as follows:
I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN OVERRULING APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE HOUSE BILL 180 (HEREINAFTER H.B. 180) PROCEEDINGS AGAINST HIM ON EX POST FACTO GROUNDS.
II. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN OVERRULING APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE H.B. 180 PROCEEDINGS AGAINST HIM ON DOUBLE JEOPARDY GROUNDS.
III. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN OVERRULING APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS BECAUSE H.B. 180 IS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY VAGUE.
I, II, III
This court has previously reviewed these arguments in State v. RoyceAlbaugh (February 1, 1999), Stark App. Nos. 1997CA00167 and 1997CA00222, unreported, State v. Earl Bair (February 1, 1999), Stark App. No. 1997CA00232, unreported, and Frederick A. McIntyre (February 1, 1999), Stark App. No. 1997CA00366, unreported. We hereby adopt and incorporate the corresponding assignments of error from these opinions herein. See, also, State v. Cook (1998),
Assignments of Error I, II, and III are denied.
Hon. Julie A. Edwards, P.J., Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J., Hon. John F. Boggins, J., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.