State v. Donkers, Unpublished Decision (10-1-2003)
State v. Donkers, Unpublished Decision (10-1-2003)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} On September 22, 2003, this court consolidated these appeals.
{¶ 3} On September 15, 2003, appellee, State of Ohio, filed motions to dismiss these consolidated appeals due to lack of final appealable orders. Specifically, appellee points to the fact that sentencing has not yet occurred.
{¶ 4} It is well established that a judgment of conviction is not a final appealable order until a sentence is rendered. State v.Chamberlain (1964),
{¶ 5} In the present cases, since no sentences have been rendered, there are no final appealable orders. Thus, this court is without jurisdiction to consider these matters at this time. Appellee's motions to dismiss are hereby granted.
Appeals dismissed.
William M. O'Neill and Cynthia Westcott Rice, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.