State v. McKinney, Unpublished Decision (7-18-2003)
State v. McKinney, Unpublished Decision (7-18-2003)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} The state contends in its assignment of error that the one year suspension was mandatory and that the trial court had no authority to terminate the suspension before the one year term of suspension expired. McKinney has not filed a brief in response.
{¶ 3} We agree with the state.
{¶ 4} R.C.
{¶ 5} The order terminating the license suspension early will be reversed and the matter will be remanded to the trial court for the purpose of reimposing the one year license suspension, subject to credit for the period that the suspension was in effect.
FAIN, P.J., and GRADY, J., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.