Graybeal v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., Unpublished Decision (12-5-2003)
Graybeal v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., Unpublished Decision (12-5-2003)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2}
{¶ 3} Appellant, Gregory A. Graybeal, filed UM/UIM claims pursuant to Scott-Pontzer, supra, against appellee, Cincinnati Insurance Company ("CIC"), his employer's insurer. It is undisputed that Graybeal was not acting within the scope of his employer's business when the accident related to his UM/UIM claims occurred.
{¶ 4} Pursuant to Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis,
{¶ 5} Graybeal's sole assignment of error is not well-taken.
{¶ 6} The judgment of the Huron County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed. Court costs of this appeal are assessed to appellant.
Judgment affirmed.
Mark L. Pietrykowski, J., Judith Ann Lanzinger, J., Arlene Singer, J., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.