State v. Pursley, Unpublished Decision (6-19-2003)
State v. Pursley, Unpublished Decision (6-19-2003)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} This court will not issue an extraordinary writ in order to correct any alleged error in the calculation of jail time credit. Such error must be addressed through an appeal.1
{¶ 3} In addition, we find that Pursley's complaint for a writ of mandamus is defective since it is improperly captioned. The petition must be brought in the name of the state, on relation of the person applying, and the failure to properly caption warrants dismissal.2
{¶ 4} Pursley has also failed to support his complaint with an affidavit "specifying the details of the claim" as required by Loc. App.R. 45(B)(1)(a).3 Finally, he has failed to comply with R.C.
{¶ 5} Accordingly, we grant Judge Boyko's motion to dismiss the complaint for a writ of mandamus. Costs to Pursley. It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Eighth District Court of Appeals serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and the date of its entry as mandated by Civ.R. 58(B).
Dismissed.
PATRICIA A. BLACKMON, P.J., And JAMES J. SWEENEY, J., Concurs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.