In the Matter of Hayner, Unpublished Decision (10-27-2003)
In the Matter of Hayner, Unpublished Decision (10-27-2003)
2003 Ohio 5829
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 1} Appellant's Third Assignment of Error is sustained1 for the reason that MCJFS failed to comply with the time limits imposed by statute.
{¶ 2} Appellant's First and Second Assignments of Error are overruled as moot.
{¶ 3} The judgment of the trial court is reversed as to the Third Assignment of Error.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.