State v. Norfleet, Unpublished Decision (10-21-2003)
State v. Norfleet, Unpublished Decision (10-21-2003)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} Appellant assigns as error:
{¶ 5} On August 29, 2003, counsel for appellant notified this Court that he had advised appellant in writing that he was filing a brief pursuant to Anders vs. California (1967),
{¶ 6} Additionally, counsel for appellant requested that he be permitted to withdraw as counsel for appellant.
{¶ 7} When appointed counsel finds a case to be wholly frivolous, after conscientious examination of the record, counsel should so advise the Court and request permission to withdraw, supplying a brief referring to anything in the record that might arguably support the appeal.Anders, supra.
{¶ 8} In the instant case, we have examined the entire record, and agree with counsel for appellant that the appeal is wholly frivolous. We find nothing in the record before us that would suggest that appellant was denied a fair trial.
{¶ 9} Moreover, appellant's own testimony was sufficient to support a finding that appellant assaulted Mr. Sumpter.
{¶ 10} Accordingly, we hereby overrule appellant's sole assigned error and affirm the judgment of conviction and sentence entered in the Coshocton Municipal Court.
{¶ 11} Attorney Terrence J. Baxter's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for appellant is hereby granted.
By: Gwin, P.J., Farmer, J. and Edwards, J. concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.