In the Matter of Brown, Unpublished Decision (2-5-2003)
In the Matter of Brown, Unpublished Decision (2-5-2003)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} On December 11, 2002, we issued an order requiring appellants to show cause why we were not compelled to dismiss the appeal and why their appeal, essentially on behalf of the state, the real party in interest, did not implicate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
{¶ 3} Appellants have filed no response to the order. App.R. 4(A) requires "a party" to file an appeal within thirty days of the entry or order appealed from with an exception for some civil cases. It appears that appellants were not parties to the action in the trial court nor have they established that they come within any classification of nonparties entitled to appeal. Accordingly, the case is dismissed because the appellants' lack of standing to pursue it. Moreover, even if a proper party, i.e., the state, had filed the appeal, double jeopardy principles prevent an appeal from an acquittal.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
The Court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this Court directing the Scioto County Common Pleas Court, Juvenile Division, to carry this judgment into execution.
Any stay previously granted by this Court is hereby terminated as of the date of this entry.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. Exceptions.
Abele, J. Kline, J.: Concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.