Doss v. State, Unpublished Decision (3-6-2003)
Doss v. State, Unpublished Decision (3-6-2003)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} In order for this court to issue a writ of mandamus, Doss must establish that: 1) he possesses a clear legal right to the relief prayed; 2) he possesses no plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law;2 and 3) the judge possesses a clear legal duty to perform the requested act.
{¶ 3} Although mandamus may be used to compel a judge to exercise judgment or to discharge a function, it may not control judicial discretion.3 This court may not issue a writ of mandamus to compel the judge to grant a motion.4
{¶ 4} We also find that relator failed to comply with Loc.App.R. 45(B)(1)(a) which provides that all complaints must contain the specific statements of fact upon which the claim of illegality is based and must be supported by an affidavit specifying the details of the claim.5 Additionally, we find that the petition is defective since it is improperly captioned. A petition for a writ of mandamus must be brought in the name of the state, on relation of the person applying. Doss' failure to properly caption his petition constitutes sufficient reason for dismissal.6
{¶ 5} He also failed to comply with R.C.
{¶ 6} Accordingly, we dismiss the petition. Doss to pay costs. Complaint Dismissed.
KENNETH A. ROCCO, A.J. and COLLEEN CONWAY COONEY, J., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.