State v. Muhammad, Unpublished Decision (12-22-2003)
State v. Muhammad, Unpublished Decision (12-22-2003)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} On February 26, 1999, appellant was granted judicial release and was placed on three years of community control. On May 13, 2002, appellee filed a motion to revoke appellant's community control. Appellant waived his right to a hearing. By judgment entry filed March 27, 2003, the trial court found appellant violated the terms and conditions of his community control, and re-imposed the suspended sentence.
{¶ 3} Appellant filed an appeal and this matter is now before this court for consideration. Assignments of error are as follows:
{¶ 7} In its brief at 4, the state claims, "Counsel for Appellee does not believe Appellant's Assignment of Error is incorrect." The state noted appellant's community control expired on February 26, 2002, and the motion to revoke was filed on May 13, 2002.
{¶ 8} Based upon the concession by the state, we find the trial court lacked jurisdiction to revoke appellant's community control.
{¶ 9} Assignment of Error I is granted.
{¶ 11} The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Fairfield County, Ohio is hereby vacated.
Hoffman, P.J. and Edwards, J. concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.