Ohio Court of Appeals, 2003

Sagenich v. Erie Insurance Group, Unpublished Decision (12-12-2003)

Sagenich v. Erie Insurance Group, Unpublished Decision (12-12-2003)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided December 12, 2003 · WILLIAM M. O'NEILL, J.
2003 Ohio 6767
Sagenich v. Erie Insurance Group, Unpublished Decision (12-12-2003)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION
{¶ 1} On October 3, 2003, appellant, American Guarantee and Liberty Insurance, filed a notice of appeal from a September 8, 2003 judgment of the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas. In that judgment, the trial court denied appellant's motion for summary judgment and indicated "[t]his is a final and appealable order, and there is not just cause for delay."

{¶ 2} On October 10, 2003, appellee, Erie Insurance Group, filed a motion to dismiss this appeal due to lack of a final appealable order. On October 22, 2003, appellant filed a memorandum in opposition to the motion to dismiss.

{¶ 3} It is well established that the denial of a motion for summary judgment is generally not a final appealable order. State exrel. Overmeyer v. Walinski (1966), 8 Ohio St.2d 23. This is due to the fact that the denial does not determine the action and prevent a judgment and is, therefore, not a final order under R.C. 2505.02. Celebrezze v.Netzley (1990), 51 Ohio St.3d 89, 90. See, also, Klein v. Portage Cty. (2000), 139 Ohio App.3d 749, 751. The denial of a motion for summary judgment is always reviewable on appeal following a subsequent final judgment.

{¶ 4} Additionally, the mere addition of Civ.R. 54(B) language, that there is no just reason for delay, does not transform what is an otherwise interlocutory order into a final appealable order. As stated by the Supreme Court of Ohio in Wisintainer v. Elcen Power Strut Co. (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 352, at 354, "the phrase `no just reason for delay' is not a mystical incantation which transforms a nonfinal order into a final order." See, also, Graines v. Y.D.C. Corp. (May 11, 2001), 11th Dist. No. 2000-L-053, 2001 WL 501994.

{¶ 5} Based upon the foregoing analysis, appellee's motion to dismiss this appeal is hereby granted since the trial court has not yet issued a final order. Hence, this court is without jurisdiction to consider this matter.

{¶ 6} The appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Donald R. Ford, P.J., and Cynthia Westcott Rice, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.