Wells Fargo Bank., Minnesota v. Williams, Unpublished Decision (3-21-2003)
Wells Fargo Bank., Minnesota v. Williams, Unpublished Decision (3-21-2003)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} On August 30, 2002, a parcel of real estate was offered for sale by the Sheriff of Marion County. The appraised value of the parcel was $65,000. At the sale, Schlecht was the successful bidder at $56,100. On September 3, 2002, appellee Wells Fargo Bank ("Wells") sought to have the sale set aside. The basis for its motion was that its agent had been confused and stopped bidding before he was supposed to do so. On September 5, 2002, Schlecht filed a motion to intervene and for specific performance. The trial court overruled the motion to intervene and granted Wells' motion to vacate the sale. It is from this judgment that Schlecht appeals and raises the following assignment of error. Where a judicialsale has been held and conforms to the requirements of [R.C.
{¶ 3} This court may not address Schlecht's assignment of error because Schlecht has no standing to bring the appeal. [P]urchasers at aforeclosure sale have no vested interest in the property prior toconfirmation of the sale by the trial court. As a result, the purchasershave no standing to appeal if the trial court subsequently deniesconfirmation.
{¶ 4} Ohio Savings Bank v. Ambrose (1990),
Appeal dismissed.
SHAW and CUPP, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.