Edgell v. Monroe Guar. Ins. Co., Unpublished Decision (3-25-2003)
Edgell v. Monroe Guar. Ins. Co., Unpublished Decision (3-25-2003)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} On January 10, 2001, appellees, Gary Edgell, individually and as administrator of the Estate of Eric Edgell, and others, filed a declaratory judgment action against appellant to determine insurance coverage.
{¶ 3} All parties filed motions for summary judgment. By judgment entry filed February 8, 2002, the trial court granted appellees' motion for summary judgment. On March 6, 2002, the trial court entered final judgment in favor of appellees and against appellant.
{¶ 4} Appellant filed an appeal and this matter is now before this court for consideration. Assignments of error are as follows:
{¶ 8} We find our decision in Westfield Insurance Company v.Wausau Business Insurance Company (December 30, 2002), Stark App. Nos. 2002CA00138 and 2002CA00150, to be controlling sub judice. We find the rationale of this case is in accordance with decisions from other districts. See, Mizen v. Utica National Insurance Group,
{¶ 9} Assignment of Error I is denied.
{¶ 11} We find this assignment of error is not ripe for appeal. Although appellant properly moved on summary judgment on this issue, the trial court did not address it in the judgment entry which is the subject matter of this appeal.
{¶ 12} Assignment of Error II is denied.
{¶ 13} The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Muskingum County, Ohio is hereby affirmed.
Hoffman, P.J. and Boggins, J. concur.
Topic: Scott-Pontzer applies to school board's insurance policy.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.