Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2003

State v. Dues, Unpublished Decision (8-21-2003)

State v. Dues, Unpublished Decision (8-21-2003)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided August 21, 2003 · <bold>ANTHONY O. CALABRESE, JR., Judge</bold>.

State v. Dues, Unpublished Decision (8-21-2003)

Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY and OPINION.
{¶ 1} Pursuant to R.C. 2929.19(B)(3), the trial court has a mandatory duty at the sentencing hearing to notify the defendant that he is subject to post-release controls. State v. Rashad (Nov. 8, 2001), Cuyahoga App. No. 79051. The record indicates, and the parties agree, that the trial court failed to comply with this mandatory requirement. We, therefore, vacate the sentence imposed and remand this case for resentencing.

KENNETH A. ROCCO, A.J. and ANN DYKE, J. concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑