Progressive Max Ins. v. Grange Mutual Cas., Unpublished Decision (1-16-2003)
Progressive Max Ins. v. Grange Mutual Cas., Unpublished Decision (1-16-2003)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} This court has routinely noted that a trial court fails to fulfill its function when it disposes of the issues in a declaratory judgment action by journalizing an order sustaining or overruling a motion for summary judgment without fully setting forth any construction of the document under consideration. See Haberley,
{¶ 3} Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for lack of a final and appealable order, at appellant's cost.
It is ordered that appellee recover of appellant costs herein taxed.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
KENNETH A. ROCCO, A.J., AND MICHAEL J. CORRIGAN, J., CONCUR.
N.B. This entry is an announcement of the court's decision. See App.R. 22(B), 22(D) and 26(A); Loc.App.R. 22. This decision will be journalized and will become the judgment and order of the court pursuant to App.R. 22(E) unless a motion for reconsideration with supporting brief, per App.R. 26(A), is filed within ten (10) days of the announcement of the court's decision. The time period for review by the Supreme Court of Ohio shall begin to run upon the journalization of this court's announcement of decision by the clerk per App.R. 22(E). See, also S.Ct.Prac.R. II, Section 2(A)(1).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.