Booker v. Christman, Unpublished Decision (6-4-2004)
Booker v. Christman, Unpublished Decision (6-4-2004)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} Mandamus will not lie to enforce a private right against a private person as Booker is attempting. State ex rel.Longacre v. Penton Publishing Co. (1997),
{¶ 3} Furthermore, we find that Booker's petition is defective since it is improperly captioned. The complaint for an extraordinary writ must be brought by petition, in the name of the state on relation of the person applying. Booker's failure to properly caption his petition for a writ of mandamus constitutes sufficient reason for dismissal. Allen v. Court of Common Pleasof Allen City (1962),
{¶ 4} Booker also failed to comply with R.C.
{¶ 5} Accordingly, we dismiss this action sua sponte. Relator to pay costs. It is further ordered that the clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and date of entry pursuant to Civ.R. 58(B).
Writ Dismissed.
Karpinski, J., concurs. McMonagle, J., concurs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.