Cincinnati Ins. v. Preserving Aff. Hsg., Unpublished Decision (12-30-2004)
Cincinnati Ins. v. Preserving Aff. Hsg., Unpublished Decision (12-30-2004)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} In Universal Contracting v. Aug (Dec. 30, 2004), 1st Dist. No. C-030719,1 this court held that Universal could not proceed against Aug for negligent misrepresentation where the parties had specifically contracted to protect against potential economic liability resulting from false information about PAH's economic health. In light of this decision, and because there are no genuine issues of material fact remaining in this case as to whether Universal may proceed against Aug for tort damages, the assignment of error is overruled and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. See Civ.R. 56(C).
Judgment affirmed.
Winkler, P.J., Hildebrandt and Gorman, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.