Portage Cty. Reg. Plan. v. City of Kent, Unpublished Decision (1-16-2004)
Portage Cty. Reg. Plan. v. City of Kent, Unpublished Decision (1-16-2004)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} On December 10, 2003, appellant filed a motion to extend the remand to the trial court. It is apparent that on November 24, 2003, the trial court magistrate conducted a status conference at which time it was determined that additional evidence would be required in order to make a decision. The magistrate stated, "additional summary judgment proceedings and/or a trial will be necessary."
{¶ 3} On December 23, 2003, counsel for appellant admitted to this court in a telephone conversation that, in her opinion, there has yet to be issued a final appealable order in this case. We agree. All judgments entered by the trial court up until this point in time have been interlocutory in nature. This court will not have jurisdiction until a final appealable order is issued.
{¶ 4} Accordingly, this appeal is hereby, sua sponte, dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction.
{¶ 5} The appeal is dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Ford, P.J., and Rice, J., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.